Mice carrying both copies of the shortened gene didn't survive, but those with one long and one short version were born with a variety of tail lengths - from none at all to nearly normal. The finding also suggests the genetic shift came with a less visible and more dangerous effect: a higher risk of birth defects involving the developing spinal cord. Now, researchers may have unearthed a simple genetic change that led to our abbreviated back end: an itinerant piece of DNA - in a gene known as TBTX - that leapt into a new chromosomal home and changed how great apes make a key developmental protein. But humans and our cousins the great apes lack them. Sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine: Mammals from mice to monkeys have tails. Yes, we all want shiny new toys - and we'll have plenty of them - but we shouldn't build that future atop the prematurely discarded remains of our electronic past.
#DRIVER WHIZ SERIAL KEY GENERATOR SOFTWARE#
But even if they fell wholly on the purchaser, consumers would, I suspect, be willing to pay a few dollars more for a gadget if that meant reliable access to software for it - indefinitely.
The devilish details come in decisions about who should bear those costs. Or maybe they aren't ignoring the future so much as trying to manage it by speeding up product obsolescence, because it typically sparks another purchase.ĭoes this mean Sony and others should still be supporting products nearly two decades old, like my PSP? If that keeps them out of the landfill, I'd say yes: The benefits easily outweigh the costs. We should mandate that device manufacturers set aside a portion of the purchase price of a gadget to support ongoing software maintenance, forcing them to budget for a future they'd rather ignore. I'd argue that there should be a parallel right-to-maintain movement. We have seen a global right-to-repair movement emerge from maker communities and start to influence public policy around such things as the availability of spare parts. That's bad for consumers and bad for the planet. This corporate stinginess consigns far too many of our devices to the trash heap before they have exhausted their usability. As a result, many of them are apt to drop support for old gadgets faster than the gadgets themselves wear out. Doing so costs the manufacturer some of its profits. Consumers have relied on the good graces of device makers to keep our gadget firmware and software secure and up-to-date.
Slashdot reader joshuark shares an excerpt from the article: Device makers are apt to drop support for old gadgets faster than the gadgets themselves wear out. The creator of the Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) and founder of the first virtual reality startup, Mark Pesce, opines an IEEE Spectrum piece that we need software updates forever. Earlier this year, the agency had awarded a $2.9 billion contract to SpaceX for the design and development of a lunar lander.Īlthough NASA has a long history of awarding contracts to promote innovation and competition, the Blue Origin suit seemed a little unusual given the company's current lack of launch experience (they have completed numerous successful tests, including a high-altitude " edge of space" flight for Bezos, his brother and guests, but have yet to place any vehicle in orbit, let alone establish a credible, commercial space flight presence).Īs was also reported by CNBC, the Government Accountability Office conducted an investigation in to the initial Blue Origin complaint, after NASA suspended the process, but found no evidence that NASA awarded the contract incorrectly and denied the initial Blue Origin complaint. Ytene writes: As reported by CNBC, the US Court of Federal Claims has released a redacted version of the lawsuit, filed by Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin, in a complaint against NASA.
0 kommentar(er)
